{"id":88170,"date":"2020-04-02T10:32:48","date_gmt":"2020-04-02T08:32:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aarch.dk\/?p=88170"},"modified":"2024-11-13T13:28:18","modified_gmt":"2024-11-13T12:28:18","slug":"glitches-can-malfunctions-work-as-creative-drivers-in-architecture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aarch.dk\/en\/glitches-can-malfunctions-work-as-creative-drivers-in-architecture\/","title":{"rendered":"Glitches: Can malfunctions work as creative drivers in architecture?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

News<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/section>\n

Glitches: Can malfunctions work as creative drivers in architecture?<\/h1>\n<\/div><\/section>\n

Alexandria Bo-Weong Chan has spent the past few months driving digital tools crazy. She\u2019s trying to provoke glitches in order to look for the creative architectural potential in them. The work is made possible by a year-long stipend from Verner Overgaards Familiefond.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/section>\n

02.04.2020<\/p>\n<\/div><\/section>\n\n<\/div><\/div><\/main><\/div><\/div>

\n
<\/div>

What went wrong? We usually ask that question because we want to set things right, to avoid a repeating the error. But when something goes wrong, maybe something goes right on another level. In other words: Maybe glitches hold a creative potential that can be used to offer new insights?<\/p>\n

Alexandria Bo-Weong Chan is an MA in architecture and currently working as a research assistant at Aarhus School of Architecture. Her work connects to and expands on her master thesis, and because the topic may perhaps seem somewhat abstract, she has a very down-to-earth comparison to explain.<\/p>\n

\u201cImagine you\u2019re using a broken tool like a hammer or saw. Even though it\u2019s broken, it will still do something to the material, be it wood, metal or something else\u201d, says Alexandria Bo-Weong Chan.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/section><\/div>

<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n
<\/div>
Glitches: Can malfunctions work as creative drivers in architecture?<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n
<\/div>
New experiences<\/h5>\n

Glitches have long been of interest in the world of art and are the source of Alexandria\u2019s original interest in them. But she thinks they could hold value for architects as well.<\/p>\n

\u201cGlitches in tools can help create new experiences, and in art, they are used to bring attention to the nature of our relationships with technology. My question is: How can we achieve that in architecture?\u201d<\/p>\n

To find out, she started playing around with various digital tools at the school.<\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the things I\u2019ve done is to set a 3D printer to print objects at the size of its maximum output, 0.4 mm, to see what happens when you push it to its limits. I\u2019ve also given it too much information in a sense, and what happened was that it started printing in circles before printing what I asked it to, creating a model different from anything I could have imagined\u201d.<\/p>\n

Essence and texture of materials<\/h5>\n

What may look like a futile exercise to the naked eye, in fact, may serve to open our minds to new ways of constructing or designing spaces.<\/p>\n

\u201cGlitching may also apply to CNC machines and other industrial tools. Glitches can also reveal new and interesting things about materials: Their essence, their texture, and how they can be used to transform a space. That was one of my initial curiosities: What\u2019s the boundary of safe operation, and what can pushing those boundaries reveal about various materials?\u201d<\/p>\n

Currently, she is using photogrammetry to document the canteen at Aarhus School of Architecture. It\u2019s a digital registration performed to see if photogrammetry is capable of dynamically capturing how people use the space and how they move through it. As of now, she\u2019s busy analysing the data to identify the glitches: Where is there missing information, or how is it misrepresenting certain objects in the room?<\/p>\n

Strong network<\/h5>\n

The work is made possible by a stipend from Verner Overgaards Familiefond given annually to two MA graduates in architecture. Its aim is to further innovative research in the fields of technology and design and to give the recipients an opportunity to become part of a scientific community. Both goals have been met in Alexandria Bo-Weong Chan\u2019s case.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s been quite successful, and I\u2019ve built a strong network with the other researchers at the school. It\u2019s my first time in academia, and I\u2019m fully immersed. People have been really helpful\u201d, she says.<\/p>\n

She would like to continue exploring her field of interest in the future but realises opportunities in the world of academia may be scant as a result of the global crisis we find ourselves in at the moment.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019d like to continue the research in some way, to dive back into it and, ideally, combine practice-oriented and academic approaches. I now have a foot in each world, so that would be the dream.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div><\/section><\/div>

<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n
<\/span><\/span><\/div><\/div>
<\/div>